Posts Tagged ‘firefox’

Google Chromium

chromium_logoChromium is a Google Project where users and developers will pave the way for a safer, faster, and more stable experience for all Internet users. Chromium browser is open-source project and any developer can contribute to its source code. It is based on the simple concept that Google’s Chrome is based on Chromium’s codebase, while Chromium serves as Chrome’s open-source project.Unfortunately, Chromium is not available natively for Mac or Linux systems, but Chromium is available for build and a CrossOver Chromium is also available. CrossOver is a software hat runs on Wine, which is a free software application that allows Mac or Linux (Unix-like systems) to run Windows programs. With CrossOver Chromium, Linux and Mac users will be able to use Chromium on their systems. CrossOver simply spares you the trouble of building Google Chromium on your Mac or Linux system.

Although if you’re feeling very adventurous, you can always build Chromium with Google’s Build instructions.

Building Chromium:

Prerequisites Linux: Though Chromium doesn’t support every Linux distribution, Google has tried to make the prerequisites as basic as possible.

Chromium currently runs 32 bit program, and there has been reported problems with Linux 64-bit users.

For more prerequisites, check out Google’s Linux Build Requirements.

Prerequisites Mac: There are two applications available for Mac. Choosing one depends on the level of involvement you want to put into Chromium.

Intel Mac running Leopard (Chromium does not fully function in Snow Leopard)

XCode 3.1.2 and gclient are both needed. Both can be downloaded for free. Find out more on Google’s Mac Build instructions.

Besides building your own Chromium onto your Linux or Mac, the closest thing to a native system available to day is running Chromium under Wine.

A fully native system for all Unix-like operating systems is under work but will not be available for a long time. Google developers state that you shouldn’t wait days but more like months.

DrawBacks

Chromium is not a browser to replace your default browser! Chromium is an open source program for Chrome to improve its functions and to make the user-experience the best that it can be. This is not browser to do heavy surfing, but it functions as a fun way of putting your own 2 cents in on how you think the internet browser should be run. Also, Chromium does not receive security updates. This is the one the main differences between open source Chromium and other commercial browsers. Chromium updates involve a series of new builds and upstream updates. Chromium is only for advanced web users and expert coders and is a great way to contribute your services. But unless you are well versed in web development, do not go with Chromium. Firefox, Chrome, Safari, and Opera are much more commercial and usable browsers for the average web surfer. Chromium lacks many browser features. There is no expansion service, such as plug-ins. Only flash and quicktime work properly on Chromium. Chromium does not fully support 64-bit architectures.

Contributing to Chromium

There are numerous ways of helping the Chromium project. The easiest way is simply using Chromium and submitting comments to the discussion groups that Google has set up. Other ways range from finding bugs and reporting them, filing bug reports (telling Google exactly what the problem is and where), and even submitting your own patches for these bugs.

Find more about Chromium

Chromium has an up-to-date Blog that has recently announced a new FTP Implementation! There also 2 major Discussion Groups available for Announcements and Discussion. Announcements are usually for letting users know about new builds and updates. Discussion is much more high-volume and anyone can subscribe and join in numerous topics. Topics range from design, feature improvement, questions, coding, and many others. There is also an “Issues” list that shows a list of problems and bugs that users have run into.

Everything can be found on http://dev.chromium.org/ and http://chromium.codeweavers.com/

Download Chromium

For screenshots click here

Amarok Vs songbird

Amarok and Songird are considered two best audio players in Linux and here is a short comparison between the two.

Amarok

This is a music player provided with KDE and is a one of the most popular and powerful media players available for Linux and has complete integrity with other applications of KDE.

Songbird

This is a comparatively new player with its first version being released recently.The developers call it the firefox of media players.Lets find out if it lives up to its name.

Starting with some of the basics features :

Feature Amarok Songbird
Manufacturer KDE songbirdnest.com
Download size 6MB 28.7 Mb approx
Type Free and opensource Free and opensource
Current version 2.0 1..0
License GNU General Public License, Version 2 (GPLv2 GNU General Public License, Version 2 (GPLv2


1.Looks and interface

Amarok has got plain interface of a media player and has a little options for customization of the looks but the the themes for the context window make a lot of difference.

Songbird on he other hand has got superb looks and at the first sight may be confused with iTunes.The themes make it look more fresh and lively.The switching between different themes without even giving a pause to the music is just so great feature.

Songbird wins here.

Screen shots:

blog2amarok

blog1

songbird

2.Sound quality

Amarok runs on both Gstreamer and Xine.Xine is much better than gstreamer .I personally felt the quality of sound generated by songbird was better than amarok.No clear winner this time.

3.Scripts available

Amarok has been in market for long and has a lot of fan following so it has got more number of scripts available(click here for a list of cool scripts).Whereas the scripts of songbird are less in number but are more efficient in have better quality specially the themes.Amarok gets an edge here.

4.Integration with applications

Amarok being a product of KDE has the capability of integrating well with all other desktop applications.Also the way its scripts communicate with applications like IM and twitter are great.

Songbird has a long way to go before it comes even near to amarok in this area.

5.Browser integration

Songbird has a complete firefox built in and can be even used to browser the web in a new tab.This is one of the reasons of it being called the firefox of media players.Whereas amarok is can be used only to access the Wikipedia page of the artist and the links in the page.

6.Cover fetcher

The cover fetcher of amarok gets a 10 out of 10 here.It gets the covers from the net with a high efficiency without any constraints of the language of the song.Wheres I was unable to use it with songbird even after installing 2 additional scripts.Amarok wins again

7.Memory Usage

This has been a big issue with Songbird since at times the memory usage jumps to severral times the normal usage.It uses twice as taken by amarok.Moreover the search engine for songs is too sluggish and so is the cover flow.Its the biggest drawback of Songbird.This is expected to be resolved in future(check for updates)Whereas amarok never has any such problem.

Final Verdict

Amarok is the winner by a little margin but is expected to face tough competition from songbird in future.While for those too comfortable with iTunes,songbird is a good option provided they are ready to compromise on some issues.Finally if songbird is the firefox of media players then amarok is opera!!